Q: I saw that the critics who commented on your novels noticed your vanguard and compared you to being a pioneer. To be honest, I am not good at literary criticism. I feel that you have always attached great importance to realism, and that realism kung fu is also very realistic. Of course, it includes writing people, writing things, writing their hearts, writing their emotions and mood experiences. His writing style may change, but his attitude towards realism remains unchanged. This is my solution to you. Besides, when it comes to realism, I am afraid people will think of realism and new writing. I don’t know where I took you, such as new historicism. As far as writing people’s minds is concerned, we say realism is still natural. Before a realist tells us directly how this person thinks, I think it is unreal now. Modernism, like consciously writing people’s minds and taking pictures with a camera, takes pictures of their hearts, which is mostly a partial truth. I say realism is actually writing or recording a person’s words and deeds, but it can make readers infer his actions from this words and deeds. The heart activity doesn’t look like it. Being involved in it didn’t affect reading the characters, understanding the facts, reading the text, but looking forward to it. Is it impatient and realistic now, especially the seemingly dull details, scenes, words and deeds, etc.
I don’t remember reading Camus’ righteousness, but I will look for it recently.
Answer: pioneer, is it the outside world? My novel really pays attention to realism. I understand that realism is two words accurate, but these two words are easier said than done. I understand accurately that it is difficult to write about human nature and normal things.
Ask, read, tell, show, show, read, read, read, and experience. I commend you for your writing process, too, right?
A: This is a dialogue. The novel must have a dialogue machine. Let the reader in, let the reader participate and let the reader question the character. At the same time, I don’t believe that the novel tells the world purely objectively. Nothing is pure and objective. The word pure and objective is subjective. We all live in the language, and the language also creates us.
In this way, I dare to change your hat. You are not a skeptic, but an irony, that is, you constantly question, accept and question yourself. Irony is also that you should be wary of your own language at the same time. On the one hand, because we all live in a language, on the other hand, language will cover up our life. We express ourselves, especially because the more mature and old you are, the more difficult it is for others. This is a realism philosopher’s statement. It sounds like skepticism. It is strange that it is not easy to be ignorant of my interpretation of irony.
Answer: You said so, too. It seems that I have to wear this hat because I don’t want to wear it. Many people have said this before. Irony is really similar to killing yourself first and then letting another person come to the wake together. When another person talks, tears often appear in the corner of his eyes and smiles often.
Let’s go back to skepticism. You said you were a skeptic. I think any serious and honest person can become a skeptic. Is it inevitable for a person to lose honesty and innocence through receiving education, including life education? As he discovers that adults are used to deceiving others and others, he will either become an adult or become a skeptic or a cynic. According to my understanding, this kind of skepticism has much in common, and skepticism is also much different from cynicism. Modesty, sincerity, steadiness and fortitude are more common than nihilism. Adults can be said to be nihilistic at most. Is it true that nihilism can pursue pleasure and fame and fortune without scruple? This kind of ism is often distraught and ridiculed. Do you think it will be more difficult for a skeptic to live than others?
Answer: I am a bottom line. I dare not doubt the basic values of human beings. I don’t dare to doubt it. When I was young, Kitajima said that he didn’t believe that the sky was blue. He didn’t believe that the sky was blue. I believe that the thunder is bigger than the thunder. I doubt everything and declare the emperor dead at every turn. What’s the point of that person’s life? Is it to Pass others first and then Pass by others? There will always be some positive factors left so that human beings can be said.
Skepticism is always looking for meaning. He observes wandering and tries to say that different values are different. Skepticism values are born in that kind of difference. He says that skepticism life is diachronic when it is complex, and it is diachronic in their minds. They live in different knowledge gaps, experience the disputes of knowledge and culture at all times, and explore the basis of meaning in the disputes of gap differences at that time.
You will see many wonderful stories when you browse magazines, but you will find that many storytellers don’t have their own ideas, many don’t observe the way of the world, and the way of expressing the world is often to follow the story, just like being led by others, and this feeling is particularly strong when I am an editor looking at the manuscript. More often, we are vain because people have succeeded in vain in front of us, and now emptiness is second-hand at best. In fact, nihilism is just like being vain when he is clinging to it.
But I can’t say that skepticism lives harder than others. Everyone lives harder, and it’s not easy to pursue pleasure and fame. Just a joke, skepticism doesn’t necessarily exclude pleasure and fame.
What should Jia Baoyu do when they grow up? Dialogue 3 of Wei Tianzhen
Before asking, we discussed the topic of reading. As far as I know, reading is mainly a critic, a very small number of students and young people. Of course, that’s enough. Are you just right for this group of people or one of them?
A: Now the reading of novels is decreasing, but the reading of literature is not decreasing. Compared with many people who read prose, essays and dramas, every time I go to see a drama theater, it is packed. They should also calculate the reading of literature. Considering that many movies are based on novels, it can almost be said that those movie audiences are actually reading literature. Am I encouraging my family?
I think it is true that some people with higher education account for the vast majority.
Ask me, I have heard and seen a lot of writing about people, old and young, saying that they are themselves, how to write comfortably, how to write to make themselves happy, or how to support them, but I feel a little angry and mean to say that they are themselves, because they express their impulses or express their grievances, but they will also look forward to reading and meeting.
Just write a diary if you answer yourself. Why do you want to publish it? It is hard for me to accept and believe that even the deaf-mute will come through sign language or other forms. Otherwise, he will be a walking animal and plant person or a real idiot. A novel is a public formation process from writing to publishing to being read. In fact, before writing, the family decided to write this novel, which was also stimulated by public touch. Every formation process of the novel is inseparable from the public.
When we talked earlier, I said that the novel should try to activate its reality, otherwise the novel would be suspicious in meaning. The novel should become a special way of dialogue, a dialogue device, a vessel with a harmonic resonance device. The novel is looking for its own reading, looking for its own back and launching it again. Of course, I hope to read as much as possible.
Do you think a family will get or still need to read the response in the current cultural activities? I think of course you often encounter this kind of reading. It is said that it is criticizing and researching, but you deliberately find fault or you help the axe to publish. But do you encounter such a situation that a stranger knows you less? You miss you because you read something.
Answer: When I meet the editor in charge, he will forward the reading letter to you. I have been to many countries and abroad, and some of them have been sent by editors. I have written a letter from San Francisco to discuss the fate of Bing Ying in the coloratura. It has been half a year since this letter reached my hand. I have also been to Germany and Italy to read the letter, which means that all the letters from abroad are women. Later, I met an Italian girl who read my novel and made me have a conversation. I was shocked to think that she understood it very well. I forgot that I had been to an old farmer in Jiangxi, and he wrote to me to discuss the textual research of a place name in coloratura. At this time, I feel that my work is still very meaningful.
I am interested in asking this question, because I don’t know if I can say that this is a special criticism method called reading and accepting research, which is rare in my field of vision, but it is not reliable for me to read or accept criticism at present. My manuscript is written in the outline and I will talk about who our text is. There are many ideas, but the keyboard is full of words on the screen, and the basis for searching from it seems to be speculation or one-sided words. People are now tired of talking about these examples, but what novel is it? It will arouse different people’s interest. What fictional things are more real than real people’s stories? These questions are still worth discussing. This part of what you are reading now must be a very small number of you reading more. But you remember that when I was young, I was very late in writing novels. I almost didn’t know what to do with them. Of course, I didn’t do anything early. I also had many problems when I was reading, and my thoughts were even impulsive. But I never thought of writing letters to my family. So no one knew that I should read more.
Answer: I feel that this kind of reading acceptance research is very important. What do critics think? I don’t know. Novelists obviously need to pay attention to how novelists must think about how to convey their ideas to readers. They must imagine how they might react when they accept this book. This is related to kitsch, elegance and circulation tax. I say it is still a question of writing, that is to say, writing requires that these questions be considered.
Ask me, from a purely reading standpoint, it’s not necessarily interesting to criticize too many words, but it’s not surprising that those dry readings often bring surprises.
When I answer some occasions, I will meet a reader and say that he knows me. I will ask him jokingly. Oh, you said that you know Li Er. What word is that word? If he is wrong, I can’t point out on the spot that I will try to get away. If I am right, I think that people have really seen my family. If I talk about it, I will listen to their opinions carefully. Just last week, Beijing University of Technology was alone. I didn’t know him. He wrote to the magazine and asked me if it was true or false. He was from Shanxi and said that he wanted to go to Erligang in the novel. You will know that this man is a layman to Wen as soon as you listen to the battlefield of mourning for the first two Li Gang, but I am still very happy because I wrote this novel to make people regard it as a part of history.
Of course, it is impossible to make such mistakes in professional reading. It is also an interesting phenomenon that many professionals read coloratura, but it is difficult to read it. Because he has a fixed view on the form of novels and the way of telling stories, it is difficult for non-professionals to read your novels, regardless of whether his heart is true, accurate, inaccurate, interesting or not. What meaning information does the novel give him, so that he can read it smoothly? When it comes to the people’s literature, Ms. Liu Zhi is in charge of editing the novel, and she is not sure about the number of copies of the novel. I found several people to see the critics, professional editors and her mother’s nanny, and she found that her mother’s nanny read the fastest, while some critics’ professional editors stumbled and read very interestingly, didn’t they?
Ask me about your novels, but I want to avoid reading them. I’m flattering. I want to say that I have no taste in your quality, but it’s because I’m interested in you or because I can lend you money to pour my own foundation
A: I’m glad that my novel can be written by you. It’s not too much to say that I’m happy and excited.
Ask me this because I think the level of creative writing is not very high at present, because there are too many famous writers and each writer has written too much. Of course, it is not necessarily good to write slowly and send too little, but it is not necessarily bad to write too fast. Maybe my idea is too old-fashioned and too dry, that is, a very talented writer. Is it better to write slowly than to write two novels in one head or revise and rewrite them than to be urged to wait for rice pot?
Answer: China’s family’s level of physical innovation is not high. I want to write fast and slow, but the main problem seems to be more complicated than this. I think it involves the expressive force of modern Chinese, the cultural system and the complex situation of contemporary China. To deal with the problem, the individual talents of the family are of course of quality, but the deeper reasons are also worth discussing
A few years ago, I saw a statement made by Professor Zhang Zhiyang, and I deeply felt the same at that time. He seemed to say that the suffering of the Han nationality and the Jewish nationality was almost equal, but when the Chinese language reached such heavy suffering, it often lost weight, while the Jews wrote in English or other languages, but it didn’t. Chinese seemed to accurately express Auschwitz in China. Of course, the first thing is that cultural issues are closely related to our cultural system. A few days ago, I saw a speech by Professor Hai Wang Hongsheng, who wrote a narrative of the Han nationality. When it comes to the narrative process of the Han nationality, the particularity of other nationalities is less unified than the myth of the Han nationality. The Han nationality has never had a true epic. When I wrote about forgetting, I felt deeply at that time, because I found that our myth story was broken, the spectrum was very chaotic, and there was almost no clue. I think these all had a profound impact on our narrative system
The more realistic problem is that when the language and culture in contemporary China are greatly changed, it will be really hard to cope with it. Life has changed so fast that we can’t see everything. Everyone has become Granny Liu, and even Xifeng has become Granny Liu. We even don’t even have Granny Liu to save Qiaoer in the end, but we even know how to save our lives. Life is so chaotic that no one knows where we are going. We are classical Chinese, modern Chinese and new-period Chinese. Pan-contact with western modern and contemporary literature has failed to give us an effect to learn from. I often say that I am now at home. Of course, I mean some ideologists. He writes almost a portrait of the complex world, just like an orphan. Last year, at a seminar, I boldly said a real idea that Cao Xueqin is not necessarily higher than his current home in expressing contemporary life.
However, these problems are generally not considered in reading. Of course, people don’t need to think about these problems. It is only necessary to know how ripe apples are. I think the reading experience may be like this. I feel what the world has not been presented in you or what you have presented in the world. I feel that the world is different. The highest level of writing and reading is the fusion of vision, but now it is the separation of vision. In this case, people, including writers, will express dissatisfaction with the current writing.
I agree with you very much. On June 3rd, I attended a meeting for the first time, and I couldn’t help but speak that I was an effort to save people. People asked about the past, and now AIDS rescue villages don’t know the knowledge of saving. Of course, I’m right. I have to think about what I’ve got into the ointment and raise hidden diseases, and I blame myself for what I want to save, or I want to talk loudly in places where people are crowded. Because we feel like an orphan, we will only seek responses. Because we live in a separate field of vision, it is possible to write and read, and seek a field of vision If you want to integrate your horizons, you should be honest with each other, not your world, which happens to be familiar or interesting to me. Actually, when it comes to the problem of dissatisfaction with writing, the people we talk to can’t help wandering. Imagine reading, as we said earlier, the third kind of reading, he may be in charge of your discussion directly, or he may treat you as Cao Xueqin. As an ancient family, you can talk about some ideas only when you integrate your horizons before you can discuss it. Specialized horizon integration should also include accepting different horizons and broadening your horizons. When it comes to the particularity of Chinese language and cultural narrative system, I think it’s not that writing about meaning is a barrier at present. A true family member will write sincerely. Even if a true family member is himself after all, he will write well and count the money spent on personal efforts as an investment. Many new hometowns are too short-sighted and eager to make a sensation. Can they become popular in the next year, and so on? I think Cao Xueqin is a self-writer, and he also wrote about a certain circle of life at that time. I can’t imagine his near-death.
It’s great to answer this sentence. It’s only possible to separate horizons and integrate them. This sentence gives me confidence in writing and urges me to consider the problem further.
It should be said that in recent years, people have paid more and more attention to me. In the first two years, Gefei wrote a peach blossom with a human face. I know that he was reading a dream of red mansions before and after writing it. Meifei is the most read family I have ever seen. It can be said that he has written a few piles of high-profile chapters on novels, but now his favorite family is Lanling Xiaoxiaosheng. I remember the last time after Bi Feiyu’s corn was published, he seriously asked me for my opinion on this novel. At that time, many popular novels described strength. Twisting people and destroying human nature, a teenage girl has become a ghost. Bi Feiyu has also written a creative talk that he wrote a personal ghost. This ghost is everyone, but I think it is still superficial for this novel. It is the novel that has developed the narrative system of Shui Hu Jin Ping Mei. In this conversation, I realized that Bi Feiyu Shi Naian is a fellow villager and a native of Xinghua, Jiangsu Province. Bi Feiyu also told me that Jin Ping Mei was indeed on his desk when he wrote corn. Bi Feiyu is the most arrogant person I have ever met. Jin Pingmei immediately looked down on her eyes. Think about these narrative resources, which we actually ignored before. What we have to face now is that these narrative resources have been made profitable by us. Obviously, it is necessary to imagine that Cao Xueqin’s old revolution in Shi Naian has encountered new problems and they will get along again.
You said that Cao Xueqin was an individual and wrote about his life in a certain circle at that time. I doubt it, but it is almost a periodic topic, but the problems inside are very complicated. Although Cao Xueqin said that he wrote about those female voices, his personal life history almost naturally integrated into various elements of the times, just like Shuihu wrote about the life of bandits, but his writing was reversed by Confucianism, Taoism and Buddhism, and all of them were accepted. Among them, the great cultural proposition that Cao Xueqin wrote about himself can touch several future generations and leave off his talents by describing the fate of a family.
For a long period of history, what remains unchanged is less, what changes more, and what remains unchanged is actually changed because of other things. Searching for all kinds of narrative resources can effectively cope with this world and bring us a sense of real life. If we live in reality, it may be constant.
When I ask you about novels, I forget coloratura most. Their forms are unique. A story is free and easy to tell, but I’m afraid it’s not enough to write it like this. Are these two novel forms unique in theme?
Thank you for the first answer. Thank you for the similarities in form between these two forgotten coloraturas. I dare to write coloratura only after I finish writing it. Relatively speaking, coloratura is more difficult to write, and some forms or changes. At the same time, it also places more feelings on me. I seem to have been to Ge Shen before. When it comes to form, I remember that after coloratura, more than one friend and a circle friend suggested that I quickly follow the coloratura pattern to write one or two more of them into Li Er style. I didn’t want to repeat it again. I can’t repeat it in the future. I agree with you that the form and theme of a novel are important, and a story and a theme must be found. Different stories should be written in different forms than pomegranate trees with cherry blossoms. That must be very funny.
However, although the forms are different, I still think that pomegranate trees with cherry coloratura have some consistency in the spirit of the novel. Compared with all of them, they are not simply telling stories. At the same time, they all imply a lot of analysis, implying that they strive to absorb more and more complicated experiences in some cultural analysis. This story can be tested and examined in different cultural situations. I really want to write another novel according to the coloratura, which actually violates the coloratura spirit. When I write it in another way, it continues the coloratura spirit and a spirit of exploration.